Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Misunderstanding Religion

I found Rabbi David Wolpe's critique of Bill Maher's new film about religion a beautiful crystallization of my thoughts/feelings on the matter. I started to copy one paragraph and ended wanting to copy the whole thing. He touches on several points about religion as a positive force in the world. (Quite the opposite of the ever so popular argument of my generation of "spiritual" without being religious, although the article actually never addresses this notion, it argues against Maher's condescension and nihilist approach.)

Some of my thoughts, Wolpe does a much more eloquent job:

1. Religion does not make people violent. Human nature does.
2. There are always going to be cranks and crooks in every group, highlighting them does not prove religious people are stupid and misled.
3. There is something to be said for religions that have been around for a few thousand years having some insight and wisdom on the human conditions as oppose to things like The Secret.
4. Reason does not describe the full human condition alone, it would be a very sad if everything we did, thought, and felt was rational. Saying that, there is a rational aspect to belief in G-d and the idea that someone is more rational because they do not believe in G-d is presumptuous and fractured. Believing in G-d is not the opposite of not believing in G-d. Nothing about my belief in G-d is easy, I'm not blinded by my faith, in fact I'm challenged by it.
5. G-d is not a man with a long beard looking down at us, pulling strings.

Perhaps Maher's greatest misunderstanding of religion is his central indictment: that religion is responsible for the world's violence. It is not. Violence is a product of human nature. Before monotheism, the Assyrians were not kind; the Romans were bloodthirsty beyond the imagination of religious regimes. When religion became less potent in people's lives after the French Revolution, instead of making the world less violent, it became far more violent: World War I and WWII, communism, Nazism -- all shed blood on an unprecedented scale. None were religious regimes or religious wars.
Maher's dislike of religion is not reasoned, however, but visceral. He told Mother Jones magazine about the Jews praying on his plane to Israel: "Even on the plane over, they were, at a certain point, they all stood up in the aisle of the plane davening [praying] ... they just looked like crazy people, always bowing their head. It's disconcerting." No doubt had they worn Armani suits and been tapping at a keyboard, Mr. Maher would have found them rational; but seeking transcendence in coach -- crazy.

If faith is, in part, the summit of our hopes, a guide and an aspiration, then what does Maher's creed leave him with? Again, as he tells Mother Jones: "I'm telling you. I've got nothing." It should not be hard to understand why someone might choose ancient wisdom over modern nihilism. It is not heroic to believe we are accidents of chemistry.

Maher's view of human nature as essentially animalistic (he repeatedly wonders why anyone would curb their sexual appetites) is dispiriting and plain wrong. Animals we are, but we are much more than animals.

Maher misunderstands God as a projection of human need. This is a common atheistic trope -- your belief is based on psychological deficiencies, while mine is reasoned. In truth, the existence of God is not an antidote to fear but a consequence of wonder. God does not come about through faulty reasoning but through a worshipful and humble orientation of the soul.

"Religulous" repeatedly calls faith irrational. True, it is not a product of pure reason, but then what is, apart from mathematics? Reason does not get us out of bed, or move us to love or kindness. Religion is supported by reason, however. The marvel of values, ideas and consciousness -- nonphysical but powerful phenomena -- can reasonably be thought to have an origin in a nonphysical entity: that is, God. Centuries of people emboldened by, and ennobled by, faith can reasonably be thought to have something more than foolish illusions in their minds and hearts. Nevertheless, Maher calls religion a "neurological disorder."

In study after study, religion proves to make people not just happier but more likely to give to charity and have stable marriages, to reduce drug and alcohol dependence and improve mental health. That does not make it true, but it is worthy of thought: Why should something so "irrational," a mere "neurological disorder," be so helpful to society?

Many of us suspect -- or yes, believe -- that there is more to the world than we know, that there is a mystery at its heart. That mystery may evoke some unworthy speculation, attract some charlatans, occasion some cruelties. Faith is also the spur for everything from the poetry of Psalms to the Cathedral at Chartres to relief missions. "Religulous" is one-dimensional. Religion is as varied and colorful as God's blessed world.

No comments: